Journal of Computational & Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering (JCARME)

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

M. Zakyani

Aerospace Research Institute (ARI), Tehran, 1465774111, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/jcarme.2024.10905.2435

Abstract

The paper presents the large eddy simulation conditional moment closure (CMC) simulation of pilot stabilized methanol flame to study the effects of conditional scalar dissipation rate (CSDR). Two models are used in this research to evaluate CSDR: conditional volume averaging (CVA) and amplitude mapping closure (AMC). For the turbulence modelling, the dynamic Smagorinsky approach is adopted to allow for local adjustment of the Smagorinsky constant. CMC is used for turbulent combustion modeling. CVA is adopted for the calculation of conditional velocity. The temperature, mixture fraction, and major species mass fraction are compared against experimental data along radial direction for both cases. The comparison showed reasonable agreement with the experimental measurements for the temperature. It is also observed that the AMC model is superior in predictions compared to the CVA method. Additionally, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide are predicted with remarkable accuracy. Moreover, the conditional temperature is also in good agreement with experimental data that shows CMC model capabilities in turbulent combustion modeling.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Main Subjects

Thermodynamics and Cumbustion

References

[1] H. Pitsch, O. Desjardins, G. Balarac, and M. Ihme, “Large-eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows”, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 466-478, (2008).

[2] H. Pitsch, “Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion”, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 453-482, (2006).

[3] A. Y. Klimenko and R. W. Bilger, “Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion”, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 595-687, (1999).

[4] S. B. Pope, “PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows”, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 119-192, (1985).

[5] M. Zakyani and C. Lacor, “LES-CMC simulations for piloted non-premixed flames”, Proc. of LES and DNS of ignition processes and complex-structure flames with local extinction, Poland, pp. 90-97, (2008).

[6] R. W. Bilger, “Some aspects of scalar dissipation”, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 72, No. 2-4, pp. 93-114, (2004).

[7] C. B. Devaud, R. W. Bilger and T. Liu, “A new method of modeling the conditional scalar dissipation rate”, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 2004-2011, (2004).

[8] M. Mortensen and B. Andersson, “Presumed mapping functions for eulerian modelling of turbulent mixing”, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 199-219, (2006).

[9] R. O. Fox, “Effect of the conditional scalar dissipation rate in the conditional moment closure”, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 32, No. 11, (2020).

[10] S. Yao, B. Wang, A. Kronenburg, and O. T. Stein, “Conditional scalar dissipation rate modeling for turbulent spray flames using artificial neural networks”, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 3371-3378, (2021).

[11] S. Amzin and M. Domagała, “Modelling of conditional scalar dissipation rate in turbulent premixed combustion”, Computation, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 26-26, (2021).

[12] S. Navarro-Martinez, A. Kronenburg and F. D. Mare, “Conditional moment closure for large eddy simulations”, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 75, No. 1-4, pp. 245-274, (2005).

[13] F. Gao and E. E. O'Brien, “A mapping closure for multispecies Fickian diffusion”, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 956-959, (1991).

[14] A. R. Masri, R. W. Dibble and R. S. Barlow, “The structure of turbulent nonpremixed flames of methanol over a range of mixing rates”, Combust. Flame, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 167-185, (1992).

[15] M. Sion and J. Y. Chen, “Scalar pdf modeling of turbulent nonpremixed methanol-air flames”, Combust. Sci. Technol., Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 89-114, (1993).

[16] J. Smagorinsky, “General circulation experiments with the primitive equations”, Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 99-164, (1963).

[17] M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin, and W. H. Cabot, “A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model”, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 1760-1765, (1991).

[18] N. Branley and W. P. Jones, “Large eddy simulation of a turbulent non-premixed flame”, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 127, No. 1-2, pp. 1914-1934, (2001).

[19] M. Zakyani, “Large eddy simulation of non-reactive flow in burners”, J. Comput. Appl. Res. Mech. Eng., Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 51-62, (2022).

[20] M. Zakyani, “Numerical study of two reaction mechanisms on delft flame III using large eddy simulation and conditional moment closure approach”, Int. J. Ind. Math, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 339-348, (2022).

[21] P. Gaikwad and S. Sreedhara, “OpenFOAM based conditional moment closure (CMC) model for solving non-premixed turbulent combustion: Integration and validation”, Computers & Fluids, Vol. 190, pp. 362-373, (2019).

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

CAPTCHA Image