Journal of Computational & Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering (JCARME)

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, east Azarbaijan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22061/jcarme.2025.11564.2544

Abstract

In this study, relationship between effect of machining parameters on machining characteristics and surface morphology was studied in electrochemical machining (ECM). The characteristics were Material Removal Rates (MRR), Over Cut (OC), Surface Roughness (SR) and surface morphology. The results show that MRR is increased by increasing current but OC is decreased. Increasing concentration causes to increase MRR, OC and SR. Also, the analysis of surface morphology shows that the electrolyte type affects the dissolution mechanism and surface layer formation in ECM. There are cavities in NaCl and KCl that their diameter, depth and distribution on the machined surface are changed by parameters and their diameters were 4μm to 9μm. Increasing ion concentration causes to enhance the diameter size and depth of created cavities on work piece but their uniform distribution decreases, while the current has a reverse effect on them. On the other hand, an oxide layer is formed on the machined surface in NaNO3 and by increasing current and concentration, breaking and the anion cavity effect are increased on this layer. So, increasing the MRR and SR is due to this phenomenon in NaNO3.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

References

[1] M. Sankar, A. Gnanavelbabu, K. Rajkumar and N. A. Thushal, “Electrolytic Concentration Effect on the Abrasive Assisted- Electrochemical Machining of Aluminum-Boron Carbide Composite”, Mater. Manuf. Processes, Vol.32, pp. 687-692, (2016).

[2] M. Kalaimathi, G. Venkatachalam, M. Sivakumar, and S. Ayyappan “Experimental investigation on the suitability of ozonated electrolyte in travelling‑wire electrochemical machining”, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci., Vol. 39, pp. 4589-4599, (2017).

[3] A. G. ElHofy, Advanced Machining processes, First ed. McGraw-Hill Education, pp. 8-13 (2005).

[4] S. Pa and H. Hocheng, “Electrochemical Machining” Advanced Analysis of Nontraditional Machining, Eds. H. Hocheng and H.V. Tsai, New York. pp. 107-258 (2013).

[5] E. Rumyantsev and A. Davydov, Electrochemical machining of metals, first ed. MIR Publishers, Moscow (1989).

[6] L. Tang, B. Li, S. Yang et al., “The effect of electrolyte current density on the electrochemical machining S-03 material”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, Vol. 71, pp. 1825–1833, (2014).

[7] K. Sorkhel and B. Bhattacharyya, “Parametric control for optimal quality of the work piece surface in ECM”, J. Mater. Process. Technol. , Vol. 40, pp. 271-286, (1994).

[8] T. Haisch, E. Mittemeijer and J. W. Schultze, “Electrochemical machining of the steel 100Cr6 in aqueous NaCl and NaNO₃ solutions: microstructure of surface films formed by carbides”, J. Electrochimica Acta, Vol. 47, pp. 235–241, (2001).

[9] M. Datta and D. Landolt, “On the influence of electrolyte concentration, pH and temperature on surface brightening of nickel under ECM conditions”, J. Appl. Electrochem. , Vol. 7, pp. 247-252, (1977).

[10] S. Uttarwar and I. K. Chopde, “Study of Influence of Electrochemical Process Parameters on the Material Removal Rate and Surface Roughness of SS AISI 304”, IJCER, Vol. 3, No 3, pp. 189-197, (2013).

[11] D. Wang, Z. Zhu, N. wang, D. Zhu and H. Wang, “Investigation of the electrochemical dissolution behavior of Inconel 718 and 304 stainless steel at low current density in NaNO3 solution”, Electrochim. Acta, Vol. 156, pp. 301-307, (2015).

[12] D. Wang, Z. Zhu, B. He, Y. Ge and D. Zhu, “Effect of the breakdown time of a passive film on the electrochemical machining of rotating cylindrical electrode in NaNO3 solution”, J. Mater. Process. Technol. , Vol. 239, pp. 251-257, (2017).

[13] M.V. A. Ramakrishna and S. Venugopal Rao, “Fabrication of ECM and study of its parameters in NaCl electrolyte”, Mater. Today Proc ., Vol. 46, Part 1, pp. 934-939, (2021).

[14] P. Atkins and J. Paula, Physical Chemistry, 9^th ed. W. H. Freeman and Company New York, pp. 190-195, (2010).

[15] V. S. Bagotsky, Fundamentals of Electrochemistry, 2^th. Ed., Published by Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, pp. 99-116, (2006).

[16] M. Robson Wright, An Introduction to Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions, Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 421-473, (2007).

[17] H. Hocheng and H. -Y. Tsai, Advanced Analysis of Nontraditional Machining, Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London, (2013).

[18] R. Thanigaivelana, R. M. Arunachalamb, B. Karthikeyanc and P. Loganathan, “Electrochemical micromachining of stainless steel with acidified sodium nitrate electrolyte”, The 17^th CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining (ISEM), Procedia CIRP, Vol. 6, pp. 351 – 355, (2013).

[19] M. Datta, “Anodic dissolution of metals at high rates”, IBM J. Res. Dve. , Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 207-226, (1993).

[20] D. L. Pramanik and A. Chattopadhyay, “Selection of the optimum electrolyte composition and flow rate for machining a particular high alloy steel”, Precis. Eng. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 44-45, (1982).

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

CAPTCHA Image

Journal of Computational & Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering (JCARME)

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 04 October 2025

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics

Article View: 52
PDF Download: 28